Someone for whom?

Transhumanism - adequate response to the nature of how and what can be improved. Many advocates of natural, natural and environmentally friendly claim that nature is all that a person needs. Oddly enough, but they're right. In nature really has it all. Any component set atoms, specific bacteria - all exist, and stored in unassembled.

The best example - ribosome. This is an excellent example of the desirable, for a man, nanobot. Ribose parses products entering the body, and on their basis creates man. Example: Pregnant woman eating a food that is broken down in the stomach, and its constituent components are spent on the construction of the child's body.

But nature is blind, has no brain and can not think. What was it created - the product of millions of years of evolution. Man using the combined knowledge, modern equipment, material for experiments and computational techniques for the calculation of the results - creates far greater miracles.

We take from the nature of the necessary components and build them from the best products that have ever existed in the world. Even the priests in the monasteries, conducted experiments in crossing peas, intruding into "God's creation" and changing their structure.

Nature is no worse and no better than a man. It is completely different in the area of ​​development. The challenge of nature, as a single system - providing existence. Roughly speaking - the nature of the fuel to our capabilities. Having a chance to survive, we get the opportunity to improve and change the face with anything in life.

We cannot say that the man kills the nature. We make mistakes, crippling the proposed material. But it is already widely used methods to adequately collect benefits offered (solar energy, wind power, the ribosome, as an example of nanobots, illness - as a source of protection from themselves, and so on).

In man, there is something that makes us do, leaving a legacy. And this world, if they had not been created for us, we will reconstruct it for themselves.