The purity of the human

The most common argument against intervention in human nature is the question of purity. Is it right to change the nature of the organism? Whether the body is still "natural" and "full"? After all, in the end, we are literally "contaminate" his product the one who existed in the world many times smaller than a sharpened mechanism of evolution. Yes, we give a person new opportunities, cure disease, literally creates it from nothing, but remains whether the integrity of his personality, his "soul"? That is the main question asked by the opponents of intervention in human nature. But often, it ignores a very important caveat: in nature there are no "pure" people. Moreover, they never existed in the world.

Our first breath - obtaining artificial accumulation of gases, which do not consist of natural compounds in any specific way nature. In our body before - never had a similar consistency at the same dose. We have to "breathe" conventionally processed, and caught up in our body is not oxygen. But let us bear with the fact that our bodies are not able to live without the external factor. Take those things that distinguish us from animals - clothes, culture, elements of everyday life and the way we use external environment.

The very interaction with something "external" already provides two-way communication. Creating fire - we bask his warmth, preparing food - sooner or later, but we eat it. To build a place to sleep - are immersed in it, that would sleep. It always has been. All that has been created artificially, carries a definite purpose. Use it or not - a very subjective choice. After all, tastes and beliefs of each of us, may be diametrically different. The only basis for selection is advisable to create the object. So, how well it meets the need for which has been created.

Going on the road of continuous improvement, we are approaching the time that the authorities started to compensate for the loss of "natural, innate," will at times better than them. Cost characteristics: strength, endurance, resistance to damage, substitutability, securing a place best. And what to do in this case? Should we change ourselves, purposefully striving for perfection, or it is necessary to do it when absolutely necessary? The answer is given today, because there are people who go to the gym, take care of themselves, do cosmetic opreratsii. People who are already trying to change yourself for the better and, moreover, they have wonderful it goes. They create masterpieces, working with a very unusual material. Scarce, rare, banned more than a century ago. With his own body.

The issue needed more sharply conducts the contrast between the foundation of the old principles of the movement and for the better. Ultimately, more daring, fitted, ready to change people - will create a new era. Will it be better - definitely yes. Will there be a place in it for the "old" people - definitely. But of status of a person - this is a completely different question.