The limits of intervention

We are always ready to admit that we are a personality. Our interests, needs, goals and desires rapidly gaining weight, recognized the supreme measure of freedom, democracy and equality. We begin to appreciate yourself, recognize your own majesty, uniqueness and value. But this is a very subjective and reckless value.

Recognizing its value, we put ourselves above certain laws and regulations. Believing in the uniqueness and originality, we fear change. Desperately we appreciate yourself as a whole person, and thus - are closing their way to development.

Can we all be proud that we are the people? The ambiguous question. We can enjoy the fruits of their activities, and praise accomplishments See which human civilization has erected. But no more. Pay attention to those who have attained the status of genius, bringing to the world something revolutionary. Do they brag about achievements? As far as their focus is on themselves? Yes one iota! Geniuses are changing the world, boasting of taking it for granted, and nothing more. They are improved as necessary and did not see themselves as worthless or ordering. After all, if they are united, are precious and fragile, that any change would be an irreparable loss. The loss, which is difficult to reconcile. They would be frozen as stuck in amber insects, unable to take a step. Namely, the movement and is the main cause of progress.

Not every movement leads to the development. But in his absence - the development is impossible. If we do not respond to external stimuli, we die, and without revealing their potential. The least severe wobble, will lead to the fact that we can not endure it and get off the line, leaving no descendants, and not doing the natural target.

If change and transformation are so important for the evolution of, the question is raised: how much should and can change a person? Are there certain limits, beyond which it is not necessary to go out? Yes, there are such limits. But in nature, and in our minds, that we constantly and continually expand and move apart, opening up new experiences and worldviews.

Man has proven itself as an omnivore. We are doing what is not available to other animals, and forbid yourself what is natural for them. The limits of intervention in the organism, we have come up with themselves. Invented body integrity, its indivisible structure, banned operations in the Middle Ages was considered a person (still dirty and uneducated) something big and majestic. So we now prevents refuse excesses? Age of freedom and democracy has arrived, we can, we are able to determine for themselves and do what we are interested in, while not causing harm to others. Humanity can survive, even if the madmen themselves will drive themselves into the grave (which is unlikely). But humanity as a single organism, continues to persist. Perhaps this is due to the desire to survive. Perhaps it is only a throwback ... Too many reasons that would try to understand this.

First of all, we should decide what we want from the freedom to intervene in the body, and then look for ways to change people's attitude to these foundations. The limits of intervention defines each for himself alone. And everyone sees this as his own, personal benefit.