How
real is the world? The answer so far has not been found, and a number to be
found. We start from their own characteristics and possibilities of cognition
of reality that are not ideal. On the other hand, a person can use not only
what was given by nature. We are building magnificent examples of the art
mechanical and digital triggering "tentacles" to tighter
environmental studies. We look to the telescopes, launch test patterns and
threaten to reproduce the act of creating the universe.
But,
despite all attempts, we can still allow the possibility of "forgery"
of the world. Too perfect, primitive and simple our body. Brain, locked in the
skull, tends to get very metered data streams. But, despite this, we can think
logically, to allow certain embodiments, to conduct theoretical research and
try to know the essence. But do we need this?
The
meaning of life is directly dependent on the goals we set ourselves.
Objectives, often caused by a number of primitive mechanisms, whose main task -
to ensure survival. In the end, it all comes down to the fact that we do not
live and have our being, if we are satisfied with the situation. The feeling of
satisfaction - is the voice of instinct, which indicates no need for any
activity. And at this point, if we agree and behave appropriately, we cease to
be human. We refuse to do more, giving a choice of primitive mechanisms. And
what happens when we cease to aspire to anything? That's right, we stop in the
development.
The
goals of our lives create both internal and external factors. Against the
background of improvement of the world, man is action - is not just standing
still, but rapidly degrading. If he is happy, then he should not wonder about
the truth of what he feels. No need to learn more, if the influence of active
stimulus. There is no point in trying to unravel the mysteries of the universe,
if the goal is to surpass that neighbor, to seduce a colleague and a good rest.
Focusing
only on the impulses of their feelings, we switch attention to the consequence,
not the cause. Satisfied that whose nature we do not know, thus reducing the
effectiveness and efficiency of consumed energy on it. A person who tends to a
constant enrichment, does not want to be the richest in the world. It will be
enough to be richer than the particular person, or just beat him at least
something. And this is just one example.
Without
trying to find out the cause of our perception, not trying to push his limits
and a "right" to see the world, we will be engaged in only "the
elimination of the consequences." In such a situation, I do not care,
natural or not, our feelings and the fact that it is in their root. The
question rests on the development of the following ...
Are
we going to develop, trying to understand the world, "probe" of the
structure, or passively accept the results of what is happening?
0 comments:
Post a Comment