This area
of concepts and categories is very broad and has a presence in many arguments
in favor of both the first circuit of the Board, and the second. This post is
directed to arguments in favor of the undoubted rays and a more progressive
system of government. Of course, a detailed analysis of squeeze in one post
will not succeed, but the goal itself is not worth it. The main thing - is to
show the best of the options. If there are more rational and actions supported
arguments, the types of government - they are happy to be considered.
Transhumanism
- is improving with the active use of STP products. The process of development
requires a certain level of discipline, routine work and self-control. Only
perseverance and promotion system designed right, can help achieve success.
Tied for
first place the discipline, it can be assumed that autocracy would be the best
option for facilitating the evolution of man. Unfortunately, this option is not
successful. The interests of individual people whose views differ from official
statements and advocated strongly impede progress. A great example of slavery,
which was more expensive than the current system of sharing resources to work.
At that time, both the slave need to keep an eye on and monitor its movement,
free, modern man is laid out on 100% of the work in order to get the desired
profit.
Autocracy
in transhumanist society must be present as an ideology. The single goal that
unites us - evolution. Perfection - that's real good, and it is the purpose and
meaning of life (the path to immortality involves evolution).
But in the
methods of achieving this goal should be fully democracy. On our planet enough
people that would have to probe all the vectors of development. The methods
will be different, even completely opposite to, but they have a right to exist.
We should not argue with each other, arguing whose system is perfect. On the
contrary, we have to develop, build, create our ideas, goals and dreams. To
achieve success in the favorite business. Purpose transhumanism in development,
but not in the destruction.
Authoritarianism
in ideology, and complete freedom in translating goals.
Is it the
right way? The future will tell.
0 comments:
Post a Comment