Referring
to the origins of fiction, it is possible to trace the growth of the
attractiveness of subjects, which are the key ideas of the apocalypse. This can
be explained as easily create a story, and the complexity of the problems in
the creation of an ideal world of utopia, and ease of viewing the negative
consequences of progress. It is much easier to come up with a disaster than to
imagine the complexity of the problem and the ideal society. But how plausible
these subjects, and whether to be afraid of their development in the future?
Most of the
stories (a movie, a book, a game), the hero finds a way to cope with the
problem, and good triumphs at the dawn of a new day. Each author points to
advance solutions to the problem or avoiding disaster. If this problem is
hovering over the planet, the joint efforts and resources - mankind will be
able to avoid the full destruction.
But escape
destruction and remain a man - two different things. Apocalypse is described as
the end of the world, the dawn of mankind, his final existence. In the
religious world - we will disappear, ascended into heaven and finding an
eternal and wonderful life.
The same
promises and singularity. With the end of the era of transhumanism - the world
will remain only a few people consciously protect themselves against progress.
Humanity, having made a huge breakthrough will change forever.
We will
have a new body, the foundation of which will be laid not molecular processes
and subatomic mechanisms similar to those that occur in the interior of black
holes and pulsars nuclei.
Our cradle,
which we now call the planet - will remain somewhere far behind, and in front
of individuals thrown open new horizons, shocking.
Apocalypse
will happen anyway. But it is its effects have a significant impact on us, the
people or not the people.

0 comments:
Post a Comment