The
first contender for the title, was once Attila. Bloody military leader who led
a ruthless army, watering blood path and enjoying the moans enemies. His army
took away the lives of everyone who dared to speak out against the leader, in
spite of the age and sex of the doomed. So it was a century ago, when the
government established this way. Today, unfortunately, or fortunately, the
situation is somewhat different.
Each
of us has at least one device that provides delivery of information. TV,
computer with internet connection, telephone and radio - all these are the most
effective means of control. It is thanks to them we know what should wear, eat,
drink. They point to the existing political movements, give the ghost to choose
for whom to follow and lead the ideological propaganda. And propaganda - this
is not necessarily a bad thing. On the contrary, any useful propaganda, since
it holds power and promotes their positions, and those in whose address it is
directed, lend themselves to it or form a lot of protective mechanisms that
help to survive.
The
problem now is not that a lot of advertising. Not that there are lots of
sources, we are inclined to one or the other decision. The problem is that we
are not able to filter these sources. Moreover, due to a lack of knowledge and
common development, we tend to trust any opinion that seems to us presentable.
Any
information activities in favor of civilized consciousness, filled imps and
clips. Given that we live in an era of acute shortage of time and permanent
employment - information had to be made succinctly and concisely. Thus the main
condition is the impact not on logic, but on the human emotions.
We
may be persuaded to a particular point of view only because of our ignorance.
With some experience, backed up by knowledge, we are able to make informed
choices. But it will be informed when is equivalent to the impact of incentives
on our consciousness.
Only
at home, lying on the bed in silence and going through a pile of thoughts, we
can determine the wishes and possibilities. Just a sober analysis will help us
make the right choice. In demonstrations or at mass meetings, or participating
in discussions at the "round table", we have not been so close to a
rational act as alone.
Evolution
has awarded us the instinct that there is not a single animal. Our intellect
hardly uses features of analysis and synthesis, as we walk through the city,
looking a feed, or communicate in social networks. Brain (in such cases) uses
the information "writing" it directly in rare cases questioning.
It
is not the desire to think, imagine, think - is the basis of the formation of
mass movements. It does not matter what kind of movement subtext: tie hatred to
technologies or more expensive to sell another brand, to overthrow the
government or to help orphans. In any case, the goal will be our emotions, our
feelings.
Scourge
mankind is laziness and unwillingness to use its potential. Guillotine, head
over to the progress and development.
0 comments:
Post a Comment