What
we see every day? It all depends on how we are living this day. After a person
becomes a regular subject for the mass of stimuli and incentives. But at the
same time, we learn to allocate one and completely ignore the other. We
personally create a certain field of interest and fill it only with what we see
fit. This proves one of the curious effects. This is when we are faced with a
kind of a new concept, we start to notice its presence suddenly everywhere, and
quite bright and clear. But earlier this object, phenomenon or concept - was
entirely invisible to us. So can we assert that fully see the legacy of
evolution? To say that nature is harmonious, that man prevents her that the
role of artificial intervention - overrated?
We
- the fruit of evolution. Seven billion people who inhabit this tiny ball.
That's what led years of progress, development and the struggle for survival.
We look around, analyze it, what we are dealing. We are trying to use the world
to the benefit of themselves. And what comes out in the end? We ourselves
alleged climax Progress. We claim that we reached the top just because we were
lucky to be born. We believe the ancestors of savages and daily compare
ourselves with them. But if they do not, we would not exist.
Billions
of people. And those that died in bed, killed in battle, died from the disease.
They are hundreds of times more than the world's population today. Mountains of
corpses, which ceased to exist and dissolve over time. And you call evolution
"harmonious"? This process gives us a single finger while destroying
untold numbers of our relatives. A small increase in cognitive we owe several
generations that have died, but were able to convey a particle of reason. And
that would be passed on in the genes really the "best" information,
nature ruthlessly destroys anything that is even slightly
"defective." No scientist can not be compared with it. Even
concentration camps are starting to look a paradise compared with the
experiments and the ruthlessness of nature that thoroughly cleans the gene
pool.
But
man is more powerful then this. We safely take control of the situation and try
to deduce strengths organisms, while minimizing the costs and sacrifices. We
are trying to bring the situation under control and to do without victims. But
this is, as yet, not in our power.
Give
the selection a normal person who is looking for a cure for the disease: to
kill a guinea and get a result, or get results while preserving the experiment
party life. Of course, normal people will choose the latter. But the laws of
humane nature has not been canceled. While looking for a cure - people are
dying. Moreover, many are opposed to this, as a medicine, can save a hundred
people, but to kill a single. And it is considered a risk, danger. And no one
hears the groans of the dying. All interested in the question of
"fairness".
White
noise - these are the victim, against which we look progressive elite of
humanity. How long do we keep this status? How long we will be able to be on
the cutting edge of progress? Too many questions, the answers to which we will
not tell nobody. No one.
Besides
ourselves.
0 comments:
Post a Comment